Skip to main content

Access to Patient Health Records and its effect on Patient care.

The advance in communications technology and devices have made wireless electronic communication possible in most parts of the world and at any time of the day. With healthcare trends moving towards patient-centered care which empowers patients and encourages patient-provider communications as a way to lower healthcare costs and improve health outcomes. The increase in internet access and the emergence of electronic health record has created new avenues for patients to play an active role in their care. 

Most Electronic Health Records (EHR) vendors have developed patient portals to help patients electronically communicate with their physicians or healthcare providers via smartphone applications or on a personal computer giving them the ability to access and securely share their medical records. 

This portal is known as the Patient Health Records (PHR). The Markle Foundation in 2004 initially defined PHR as “an electronic application through which individuals can access, manage, and share their health information, and that of others for whom they are authorized, in a private, secure, and confidential environment. This was later redefined by the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) as a lifelong electronic resource of health information needed by individuals to make health decisions guided by these principles, individuals owning and managing their information, which comes from healthcare providers and the individual themselves. 

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009 played an essential role in proliferating the use of patient health records data. It provided incentives that helped to promote meaningful use of EHR by health systems which drove the adoption of this health technology to an all-time high in the United States.

These PHR systems create a platform that supports the vision of health services that empower patients and enables patient-provider communication, intending to improve health outcomes and cost reduction. Some functions that exist on PHR platforms include EHR-transmitted data like laboratory results and summary of care, appointment scheduling, prescription refill, and secure messaging. Through the PHR portals, patients can track their information to promote self-management, and securely share records when needed with other healthcare professionals at different institutions.

As more patients begin to take control of their care, it is essential to know if these information technology options are meeting the expected effective communication between user and doctor to improve health outcomes in patients.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) data brief of 2017 shows that fifty-two percent of individuals in the United States have been offered online access to their medical records by their health providers, with half of them viewing the contents of these records representing twenty-eight percent nationwide. Among those who accessed their online medical record, eight in ten considered their experience with the online medical record to be easy to understand and useful. Among those that did not access the online medical record offered to them, three-quarters cited their preference to speak with their health care provider directly as a reason for not using it. A quarter of them was concerned about the privacy and security of online medical records. A significant number of those who accessed their online medical records used it to monitor their health and to inform treatment decisions.

 

Some of the latest systemic reviews have found no consistent objective benefit attributable to PHR platforms and have recommended for more work to be done to establish this theory.

Significant barriers to the utilization of online medical records include concerns about security and privacy, limited technological proficiency, and a desire to preserve in-person aspects of existing patient-provider relationships.

I conducted an individual survey using an online website questionnaire developed in the google form application to access the utilization of PHR in my community. The survey tool contained demographics questions (age, race/ethnicity, gender), access to online medical records, utilization, and ease of use. The questions were adopted from the medical records section of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) instrument.

 

FINDINGS

The study shows that 83% of respondents said they had been offered online access to their medical records by a health care provider or insurer. This is a significant increase from the 2017 study with had 52% giving the same response. Among the number of people that were offered access to their online medical record, 66% viewed their record at least once, within the past year.

 

The top reason cited by individuals for not accessing their online medical records with the past year was due to preference to speak directly to a provider. 


How online medical record was used

% of individuals who accessed online medical record at least once

To look up test results

49%

To request refill of medications

20%

Communicate with provider via secure messaging

17%

Update or correct medical record

6%

Monitor health or use for informing treatment decisions

3%

Download online medical record

6%


About half of those who accessed their online medical record used it to look up test results, 20 percent of them responded that they used it to refill medical prescriptions, and 17 percent used it to communicate with health care providers via secure messaging.

The study found that a vast majority of respondents that accessed their PHR (97%) reported perceived ease of use of the online medical record platform, and 96 percent of individuals reported that their online medical record was useful for monitoring their health. 

Overall, the result shows that there is an increase in the number of people that have been offered access to an online medical record by either health care providers or insurers. This increase in access is reflected in the percentage of individuals that used the online medical record for its different functions. It is expected that with more individuals being offered access to their online medical records we are going to see a major increase in the number of individuals utilizing this platform for monitoring and making health care decisions.

 

Another significant finding is that similar to other past survey reports, individuals who did not access their online medical records despite being offered stated a preference to speak with health care providers directly as a significant reason. This means that they do not fully understand the functions of the online medical record and believe it to be a replacement rather than an added means of communication with health care providers. Some people will still prefer to speak to health care providers directly as they see the platform as a replacement for this function.

 

CONCLUSION

The use of online medical records is growing fast with individuals and caregivers working as partners in the management of their health care needs. With increased access to the online medical record, the utilization of these patient portals has grown exponentially with the use of standard functions like checking of laboratory results, prescription refill, communication via secure messaging, and viewing clinical summary of care visits. It is essential to educate patients of their rights under HIPAA to their medical records to encourage secure download and transmission of online medical records when needed by a third party. The ease of use of online medical records is key to the overall perception of the usefulness of this platform, and studies show that individuals believe online medical records are useful in monitoring their health. 

Twitter: @davo2short

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/2baba 
Email the writer:
davotushort@gmail.com 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE BIOGRAPHY OF AND TRIBUTE TO HONOURABLE CHIEF LORD MAYOR OTISI OMOJI

Mayor Otisi Omoji Otisi was born in 1926 to OMOJI OTISI of Ndi Omoji, Ihebu Ameke and Madam Inyang Eme Echeghe (Nwaegele) of Ndi Echeghe, Ihungwu, Ameke both of in the Ohafia Local Government Area of Abia State Nigeria  in West Africa. He attended the then Church of Scotland Mission School, Afiankwo, Abiriba where he obtained his First School Leaving Certificate in 1939. For his secondary education, high school equivalent, he passed through then famous Aggrey Memorial College, Arochukwu, under the revered mentorship of the great Alvan Ikoku (of blessed memory). The Abiriba community identified the young Mayor as one of the talented potentials of his generation and magnanimously sponsored him to study at the pioneer and prestigious University College, Ibadan (UCI), Nigeria, an overseas affiliate to the University of London, London. He successfully completed his course of study there in record time in 1952, thus, becoming one of the few pioneer graduates of the institution with a

THE NECESSARY U-TURN NEEDED IN THE NIGERIAN POLITY

This write up is just my personal opinion on the present Nigerian policy direction and what needs to be done at this time. Since the government of President Buhari took over power, we have had to deal with various problems that are both transferred from previous governments and new ones. We have continued the war on terror, started a seemingly new fight against corruption, tried to deal with a drop in oil price which is our main source of income, had a delay in the formation of the Presidents cabinet, a delay in budget passing last year, budget padding issues, new uprising in the South east and South  south, plus a lot more. Where do we stand today on all these issues? We are in an economic recession, the Naira is falling against all major currencies in the world, our oil production has reduced by more than half due to attacks on oil pipelines, terror attack has reduced but has not been extinguished. fight against corruption is not yielding a lot of conviction and we can go on and o

"IMPUNITY when it affects the RICH"

What is impunity?  Impunity  means  exemption or freedom from punishment, harm, or loss ".  In the  international law  of  human rights , it refers to the failure to bring perpetrators of  human rights violations  to justice and, as such, itself constitutes a  denial  of the victims' right to  justice  and  redress . Impunity is especially common in countries that lack a tradition of the  rule of law , suffer from  corruption  or that have entrenched systems of  patronage , or where the  judiciary  is weak or members of the security forces are protected by special  jurisdictions  or  immunities . This is a word used by a lot of people to express its disgust on the high handedness and oppressive actions of some government agencies and officials. It is a normal occurrence for state agencies to act with impunity on normal defenseless citizens as they have so much powers to do so but recently there has been a shift of those who are being oppressed. These days the masses stay b